The name is the button.

An agent writes the code now, and a human thumb hovers over Accept all a hundred times a day. The honest question of this decade is what, exactly, you just accepted. So I read the diff.

Eight years as a backend engineer in Stockholm, back in Tokyo since 2023, and I still ship something small most nights, usually badly. My one rule: the only real review of a model is the thing you built with it. That is why there is no leaderboard on this site.

Around a hundred and forty sources come through — the labs' own posts, the papers, the tools, the runtimes and languages nobody is watching yet, the chip under the demo, and the newsletters people actually forward. What is moving gets counted so the week reads at a glance, and every few days I explain one mechanism in plain words.

A story here is a headline, a short excerpt, one image and the link to whoever wrote it. We never reproduce the post; the images belong to their authors. A post written in Japanese appears in Japanese, exactly as it was published, and the link goes to the original.

— Yuki Halvorsen, Tokyo

← Accept All Archive

Nature Machine IntelligenceResearch

Agentic inequality

10.20

Nature Machine Intelligence, Published online: 20 October 2026; doi:10.1038/s42256-026-01318-5 Sharp et al.

Agents & vibe coding

Read at Nature Machine Intelligence ↗

One letter a week, starting soon.

Latest

Agentic inequality

Related

GitHubRedesign how your team ships software with AI agents GitLab Blog

GitHubAI Governance: One view of agent activity GitLab Blog

ValleyMicrosoft targets the ‘agentic insider’ with new controls for rogue AI agents SiliconANGLE

ValleyMiniMax launches M3.1 Flash model, says it cuts AI agent costs by 70% SiliconANGLE

ValleyMicrosoft says AI agents are like insider threats as ‘frontier models can’t be trusted’ TechCrunch AI

GitHubMiniMax just halved its token prices. Your AI agent bill may not follow. The New Stack