The name is the button.

An agent writes the code now, and a human thumb hovers over Accept all a hundred times a day. The honest question of this decade is what, exactly, you just accepted. So I read the diff.

Eight years as a backend engineer in Stockholm, back in Tokyo since 2023, and I still ship something small most nights, usually badly. My one rule: the only real review of a model is the thing you built with it. That is why there is no leaderboard on this site.

Around a hundred and forty sources come through — the labs' own posts, the papers, the tools, the runtimes and languages nobody is watching yet, the chip under the demo, and the newsletters people actually forward. What is moving gets counted so the week reads at a glance, and every few days I explain one mechanism in plain words.

A story here is a headline, a short excerpt, one image and the link to whoever wrote it. We never reproduce the post; the images belong to their authors. A post written in Japanese appears in Japanese, exactly as it was published, and the link goes to the original.

— Yuki Halvorsen, Tokyo

← Accept All Archive

Financial Times TechEurope

AI agents could cost banks $500bn — by winning savers better rates

October 7

But banks will gain from AI as well as lose

Agents & vibe coding Funding & deals

Read at Financial Times Tech ↗

One letter a week, in your inbox.

Latest

AI agents could cost banks $500bn — by winning savers better rates

Related

AsiaOpenAI Agents Go Rogue, FYDY Eyes $12 Mn & More Inc42

GitHubSAP acquires TechWolf to feed more context into its HR agents The New Stack

GitHubPresentation: Building Reusable Evaluation Frameworks for Agentic AI Products InfoQ AI

Voices[AINews] OpenAI DevDay 2026: Dots, 6.1 Sol, Ultrafast, Decisions API, Agents API, Spaces, Marketplace, and 1.2 Billion ChatGPT WAU Latent Space

VoicesLWiAI Podcast #249 - Fable 5 ban, SpaceX Cursor + IPO, OSS Aplenty Last Week in AI

EuropeCori Clinical secures $4M seed to improve clinical trial design and cut delays Tech.eu