Latest

On the calendar

予定 · Conferences and launch events, this week's stories from each corner of the industry, and what its press is covering — in English

On view

This week, from that corner the newest stories from the corner of the industry you picked

The wire their own posts, translated

How code moves in 2026 from the industry's own reports

Sources

Fetched every three hours, linked to the original

About

Accept All is a magazine, a radar and a diary about artificial intelligence and the craft of code — read from Tokyo, for people who build.

The name is the button. Code is written by agents now and reviewed by a human thumb that hovers over Accept all a hundred times a day; the whole question of this decade is what, exactly, you just accepted. So we read the diff. A magazine, because every week one model, one tool or one idea is worth reading about slowly. A radar, because we count what the labs, the Valley, GitHub and the chip makers are talking about — releases, agents, open weights, compute, funding, rules — and show it as it moves. A diary, because a seal is set each day in that day's colour, and the days add up.

We read the research labs' own posts, the American and European tech press, the Japanese and Chinese developer sites and the newsletters people actually forward, and bring it together in English and Japanese. Everything here links back to the people who wrote it; the images belong to their authors.

Accept All will keep changing. New sources, new signals, new ways of looking — a little better each week, never finished. If something here made you open a terminal, that is enough.

Thank you for reading. ありがとうございます。

← Accept All Archive

The New StackGitHub

AI’s best coding agent fails 60% of the time — and the data backs it up

September 14

Claude Fable 5.1 just won a new coding benchmark despite failing more than six out of 10 times. Its 38.8% score comes from Real-SWE, a benchmark from Y Combinator-backed Specific Labs that takes a different approach to t

Agents & vibe coding Research

Read at The New Stack ↗

One letter a week, in your inbox.

Latest

AI’s best coding agent fails 60% of the time — and the data backs it up

Related

VoicesNew Paper: Towards a science of AI agent reliability AI Snake Oil

LanguagesModular: How Frontier Coding Agents Built a Video Diffusion Pipeline on MAX Mojo Blog

LanguagesModular: Modular 26.4: SOTA MoE Serving, Model Bringup via Agent Skills, Mojo 1.0 Beta 2 and More Mojo Blog

ToolsClosing the loop: Evaluating and improving Replit Agent at scale Replit Blog

ResearchCapturing token IDs during agentic interactions for better reinforcement learning Amazon Science

ResearchA new benchmark for evaluating patient-facing health AI agents Amazon Science