The name is the button.

An agent writes the code now, and a human thumb hovers over Accept all a hundred times a day. The honest question of this decade is what, exactly, you just accepted. So I read the diff.

Eight years as a backend engineer in Stockholm, back in Tokyo since 2023, and I still ship something small most nights, usually badly. My one rule: the only real review of a model is the thing you built with it. That is why there is no leaderboard on this site.

Around a hundred and forty sources come through — the labs' own posts, the papers, the tools, the runtimes and languages nobody is watching yet, the chip under the demo, and the newsletters people actually forward. What is moving gets counted so the week reads at a glance, and every few days I explain one mechanism in plain words.

A story here is a headline, a short excerpt, one image and the link to whoever wrote it. We never reproduce the post; the images belong to their authors. A post written in Japanese appears in Japanese, exactly as it was published, and the link goes to the original.

— Yuki Halvorsen, Tokyo

← Accept All Archive

TechCrunch AIValley

Can ‘super intelligence’ and a non-binding safety pact solve AI’s image problem?

October 4

On Equity, we discussed the Trump administration's attempts to rebrand AI.

Regulation & safety

Read at TechCrunch AI ↗

One letter a week, in your inbox.

Latest

Can ‘super intelligence’ and a non-binding safety pact solve AI’s image problem?

Related

ValleyOpenAI safety employee resigns, claiming the company’s ‘culture is broken’ TechCrunch AI

AsiaIndia’s Bitchat ban highlights two key issues MediaNama

EuropeGoogle set to defend £1.2bn UK lawsuit over ‘excessive’ app download charges Financial Times Tech

AsiaOpenAI safety lead resigns, calling company culture broken Tech in Asia

ValleyOpenAI's Altman: Ascribing religion to models a "safety issue" Axios Technology

ValleyAn OpenAI safety employee has quit and is sounding the alarm The Verge AI