The name is the button.

An agent writes the code now, and a human thumb hovers over Accept all a hundred times a day. The honest question of this decade is what, exactly, you just accepted. So I read the diff.

Eight years as a backend engineer in Stockholm, back in Tokyo since 2023, and I still ship something small most nights, usually badly. My one rule: the only real review of a model is the thing you built with it. That is why there is no leaderboard on this site.

Around a hundred and forty sources come through — the labs' own posts, the papers, the tools, the runtimes and languages nobody is watching yet, the chip under the demo, and the newsletters people actually forward. What is moving gets counted so the week reads at a glance, and every few days I explain one mechanism in plain words.

A story here is a headline, a short excerpt, one image and the link to whoever wrote it. We never reproduce the post; the images belong to their authors. A post written in Japanese appears in Japanese, exactly as it was published, and the link goes to the original.

— Yuki Halvorsen, Tokyo

← Accept All Archive

Ai2Labs

Can we trust LLMs to judge whether a research idea is novel?

10.27

Old Ideas, Novel Problems tests how reliably LLMs judge the novelty of research ideas, finding that small changes to the evaluation setup can produce very different verdicts.

Read at Ai2 ↗

One letter a week, starting soon.

Latest

Can we trust LLMs to judge whether a research idea is novel?

More from Ai2 on Accept All

LabsLitPivot: Developing research ideas through dynamic contextualization within the literature landscape Ai2

LabsOlmoEarth v1.3: State-of-the-art embeddings for the whole planet Ai2

LabsA crop-mapping benchmark for the tropics Ai2

LabsFairStress: A deeper evaluation of fairness in LLM decision-making Ai2

LabsHiRO-ACEv2: Simulating extreme weather at 3 km resolution for a fraction of the cost Ai2

LabsHow Molmo 2’s open release helped an MIT researcher rethink fish tracking Ai2