The name is the button.

An agent writes the code now, and a human thumb hovers over Accept all a hundred times a day. The honest question of this decade is what, exactly, you just accepted. So I read the diff.

Eight years as a backend engineer in Stockholm, back in Tokyo since 2023, and I still ship something small most nights, usually badly. My one rule: the only real review of a model is the thing you built with it. That is why there is no leaderboard on this site.

Around two hundred sources come through — the labs' own posts, the papers, the tools, the runtimes and languages nobody is watching yet, the chip under the demo, and the newsletters people actually forward. What is moving gets counted so the week reads at a glance, and every few days I explain one mechanism in plain words.

A story here is a headline, a short excerpt, one image and the link to whoever wrote it. We never reproduce the post; the images belong to their authors. A post written in Japanese appears in Japanese, exactly as it was published, and the link goes to the original.

— Yuki Halvorsen, Tokyo

← Accept All Archive

Transformer (AI policy)Voices

Human oversight won’t solve AI warfare’s risks

10.02

The pitfalls of AI-enabled weapons don’t disappear just because there’s a ‘human in the loop’

Read at Transformer (AI policy) ↗

One letter a week, starting soon.

Latest

Human oversight won’t solve AI warfare’s risks

More from Transformer (AI policy) on Accept All

VoicesDemocrats want to lead on AI – but can’t agree how Transformer (AI policy)

VoicesScrapping Astra 6.1 looks like a good call. OpenAI shouldn’t be the one to make it. Transformer (AI policy)

VoicesAI governance is coming, with or without Trump Transformer (AI policy)

VoicesHacking is the least worrying part of OpenAI’s Australia incident Transformer (AI policy)

VoicesHow to respond to an AI disaster Transformer (AI policy)