The name is the button.

An agent writes the code now, and a human thumb hovers over Accept all a hundred times a day. The honest question of this decade is what, exactly, you just accepted. So I read the diff.

Eight years as a backend engineer in Stockholm, back in Tokyo since 2023, and I still ship something small most nights, usually badly. My one rule: the only real review of a model is the thing you built with it. That is why there is no leaderboard on this site.

Around a hundred and forty sources come through — the labs' own posts, the papers, the tools, the runtimes and languages nobody is watching yet, the chip under the demo, and the newsletters people actually forward. What is moving gets counted so the week reads at a glance, and every few days I explain one mechanism in plain words.

A story here is a headline, a short excerpt, one image and the link to whoever wrote it. We never reproduce the post; the images belong to their authors. A post written in Japanese appears in Japanese, exactly as it was published, and the link goes to the original.

— Yuki Halvorsen, Tokyo

← Accept All Archive

Exponential ViewVoices

📈 Monday data: More AI numbers, more clarity?

September 21

Companies are backing their AI claims with more numbers. What do these numbers actually tell us about AI’s economic impact?

Read at Exponential View ↗

One letter a week, in your inbox.

Latest

📈 Monday data: More AI numbers, more clarity?

More from Exponential View on Accept All

Voices🔮 AI politics & the future of growth ++ #602 Exponential View

Voices🚨 AI doesn’t need a mind to run amok Exponential View

Voices🧠 I do not want your brains to rot Exponential View

Voices🔮 What would Adam Smith make of AI? Exponential View

Voices📈 Anthropic’s $517 billion shopping list Exponential View

Voices🔮 Look up, the curve turned #601 Exponential View