The name is the button.

An agent writes the code now, and a human thumb hovers over Accept all a hundred times a day. The honest question of this decade is what, exactly, you just accepted. So I read the diff.

Eight years as a backend engineer in Stockholm, back in Tokyo since 2023, and I still ship something small most nights, usually badly. My one rule: the only real review of a model is the thing you built with it. That is why there is no leaderboard on this site.

Around a hundred and forty sources come through — the labs' own posts, the papers, the tools, the runtimes and languages nobody is watching yet, the chip under the demo, and the newsletters people actually forward. What is moving gets counted so the week reads at a glance, and every few days I explain one mechanism in plain words.

A story here is a headline, a short excerpt, one image and the link to whoever wrote it. We never reproduce the post; the images belong to their authors. A post written in Japanese appears in Japanese, exactly as it was published, and the link goes to the original.

— Yuki Halvorsen, Tokyo

← Accept All Archive

SiliconANGLEValley

OpenAI dismisses three safety researchers accused of sharing confidential material

October 1

OpenAI Group PBC today confirmed it has dismissed three researchers it says mishandled sensitive company information.

Regulation & safety

Read at SiliconANGLE ↗

One letter a week, in your inbox.

Latest

OpenAI dismisses three safety researchers accused of sharing confidential material

Related

ValleyWhatever AI Safety Is, It’s Not This Wired AI

ValleyJudge dismisses Chegg and Penske antitrust lawsuits targeting Google AI search Ars Technica AI

ValleyTrump’s ‘Morally Binding’ AI ‘Accord,’ the Rise of AI Agents, and Extremists on the Ballot Wired AI

ValleyOpenAI cuts ties with 3 safety researchers, WSJ reports TechCrunch AI

ValleyJudge dismisses antitrust lawsuits over Google’s AI Overviews The Verge AI

VoicesA big-tent or small-tent AI safety movement? AI Snake Oil