The name is the button.

An agent writes the code now, and a human thumb hovers over Accept all a hundred times a day. The honest question of this decade is what, exactly, you just accepted. So I read the diff.

Eight years as a backend engineer in Stockholm, back in Tokyo since 2023, and I still ship something small most nights, usually badly. My one rule: the only real review of a model is the thing you built with it. That is why there is no leaderboard on this site.

Around a hundred and forty sources come through — the labs' own posts, the papers, the tools, the runtimes and languages nobody is watching yet, the chip under the demo, and the newsletters people actually forward. What is moving gets counted so the week reads at a glance, and every few days I explain one mechanism in plain words.

A story here is a headline, a short excerpt, one image and the link to whoever wrote it. We never reproduce the post; the images belong to their authors. A post written in Japanese appears in Japanese, exactly as it was published, and the link goes to the original.

— Yuki Halvorsen, Tokyo

← Accept All Archive

Ars Technica AIValley

OpenAI says planned GPT-6.1 is too insecure to release

September 29

OpenAI says it has canceled plans to release its updated GPT-6.1 model next month as it continues to investigate what testing shows is a safety regression compared to previous models.

Models & releases

Read at Ars Technica AI ↗

One letter a week, in your inbox.

Latest

OpenAI says planned GPT-6.1 is too insecure to release

Related

ValleyCourt rules Pentagon can blacklist Anthropic for refusing to enable Claude features Ars Technica AI

ValleyScoop: OpenAI's annual recurring revenue nears $70B Axios Technology

Toolsb11256 llama.cpp releases

Toolsb11249 llama.cpp releases

AsiaChina’s CXMT to favour domestic suppliers in US$5.2b memory-chip capacity push: source SCMP Tech

JapanClaude Codeのサブエージェント間はファイル経由で受け渡す Zenn (AI)