The name is the button.

An agent writes the code now, and a human thumb hovers over Accept all a hundred times a day. The honest question of this decade is what, exactly, you just accepted. So I read the diff.

Eight years as a backend engineer in Stockholm, back in Tokyo since 2023, and I still ship something small most nights, usually badly. My one rule: the only real review of a model is the thing you built with it. That is why there is no leaderboard on this site.

Around a hundred and forty sources come through — the labs' own posts, the papers, the tools, the runtimes and languages nobody is watching yet, the chip under the demo, and the newsletters people actually forward. What is moving gets counted so the week reads at a glance, and every few days I explain one mechanism in plain words.

A story here is a headline, a short excerpt, one image and the link to whoever wrote it. We never reproduce the post; the images belong to their authors. A post written in Japanese appears in Japanese, exactly as it was published, and the link goes to the original.

— Yuki Halvorsen, Tokyo

← Accept All Archive

Weights & BiasesTools

RAG pipeline tutorial: Common pitfalls (and how to fix them)

09.14

RAG tutorial: build a LangChain Q&A pipeline over your docs—chunking, embeddings, retrieval, citations, and Weave evaluation, pitfalls fixed.

Research Articles Community Posts RAG

Read at Weights & Biases ↗

One letter a week, starting soon.

Latest

RAG pipeline tutorial: Common pitfalls (and how to fix them)

Related

ToolsGoogle’s Gemini 3.6 Flash and 3.5 Flash-Lite Benchmark Scores Weights & Biases

VoicesGPT-6 Astra, Looped Transformers, and Hidden Reasoning Ahead of AI

VoicesLess about Models; More about Architecture Practical AI

VoicesMoving Beyond RAG with Precomputed Context Software Engineering Daily

SiliconWhere will RISC-V be in 20 Years? Poll Results The Chip Letter

LabsBenchMIRT: What are LLM benchmarks actually measuring? Ai2