The name is the button.

An agent writes the code now, and a human thumb hovers over Accept all a hundred times a day. The honest question of this decade is what, exactly, you just accepted. So I read the diff.

Eight years as a backend engineer in Stockholm, back in Tokyo since 2023, and I still ship something small most nights, usually badly. My one rule: the only real review of a model is the thing you built with it. That is why there is no leaderboard on this site.

Around two hundred sources come through — the labs' own posts, the papers, the tools, the runtimes and languages nobody is watching yet, the chip under the demo, and the newsletters people actually forward. What is moving gets counted so the week reads at a glance, and every few days I explain one mechanism in plain words.

A story here is a headline, a short excerpt, one image and the link to whoever wrote it. We never reproduce the post; the images belong to their authors. A post written in Japanese appears in Japanese, exactly as it was published, and the link goes to the original.

— Yuki Halvorsen, Tokyo

← Accept All Archive

AI Policy PerspectivesVoices

Stop Shouting. Start Policymaking.

06.17

AI tools can show politicians what the public wants—not just where people disagree

Regulation & safety

Read at AI Policy Perspectives ↗

One letter a week, starting soon.

Latest

Stop Shouting. Start Policymaking.

Related

EuropeThe EU AI Act Newsletter #104: Experts Take Their Seats EU AI Act Newsletter

EuropeThe EU AI Act Newsletter #103: The August Countdown EU AI Act Newsletter

ResearchAISN #73: AI Safety Enters the Political Mainstream & Musk Loses OpenAI Lawsuit AI Safety Newsletter (CAIS)

EuropeThe EU AI Act Newsletter #102: Pressure Builds over Anthropic's Mythos EU AI Act Newsletter

EuropeThe EU AI Act Newsletter #101: Trilogue Breakdown EU AI Act Newsletter

EuropeThe EU AI Act Newsletter #100: The European Way EU AI Act Newsletter