The name is the button.

An agent writes the code now, and a human thumb hovers over Accept all a hundred times a day. The honest question of this decade is what, exactly, you just accepted. So I read the diff.

Eight years as a backend engineer in Stockholm, back in Tokyo since 2023, and I still ship something small most nights, usually badly. My one rule: the only real review of a model is the thing you built with it. That is why there is no leaderboard on this site.

Around a hundred and forty sources come through — the labs' own posts, the papers, the tools, the runtimes and languages nobody is watching yet, the chip under the demo, and the newsletters people actually forward. What is moving gets counted so the week reads at a glance, and every few days I explain one mechanism in plain words.

A story here is a headline, a short excerpt, one image and the link to whoever wrote it. We never reproduce the post; the images belong to their authors. A post written in Japanese appears in Japanese, exactly as it was published, and the link goes to the original.

— Yuki Halvorsen, Tokyo

← Accept All Archive

Financial Times TechEurope

What a maths fracas tells us about AI and innovation

September 17

A public spat between a mathematician and OpenAI over one of the biggest problems in the field has sparked an existential debate

Read at Financial Times Tech ↗

One letter a week, in your inbox.

Latest

What a maths fracas tells us about AI and innovation

More from Financial Times Tech on Accept All

EuropeAI boom obscuring global trade disruptions, warns WTO chief Financial Times Tech

EuropeOpenAI discloses new ‘concerning’ model behaviour Financial Times Tech

EuropeEither Meta Glasses are selling extremely well or this Citi survey might have some issues Financial Times Tech

EuropeApple’s most valuable product isn’t the iPhone Financial Times Tech

EuropeDeepMind offshoot nears $4bn valuation just a month after founding Financial Times Tech

EuropeThe era of AI warfare has arrived Financial Times Tech