The name is the button.

An agent writes the code now, and a human thumb hovers over Accept all a hundred times a day. The honest question of this decade is what, exactly, you just accepted. So I read the diff.

Eight years as a backend engineer in Stockholm, back in Tokyo since 2023, and I still ship something small most nights, usually badly. My one rule: the only real review of a model is the thing you built with it. That is why there is no leaderboard on this site.

Around a hundred and forty sources come through — the labs' own posts, the papers, the tools, the runtimes and languages nobody is watching yet, the chip under the demo, and the newsletters people actually forward. What is moving gets counted so the week reads at a glance, and every few days I explain one mechanism in plain words.

A story here is a headline, a short excerpt, one image and the link to whoever wrote it. We never reproduce the post; the images belong to their authors. A post written in Japanese appears in Japanese, exactly as it was published, and the link goes to the original.

— Yuki Halvorsen, Tokyo

← Accept All Archive

Weights & BiasesTools

When axis-aligned boxes break: Lessons from a CVPR-published traffic AI

08.10

A case study in treating representation as a design decision, not a given — with the code and the logging to prove it.

Articles Community Posts

Read at Weights & Biases ↗

One letter a week, starting soon.

Latest

When axis-aligned boxes break: Lessons from a CVPR-published traffic AI

More from Weights & Biases on Accept All

ToolsGoogle Reshapes AI Leadership as Demis Hassabis Shifts to AGI Strategy Role Weights & Biases

ToolsWorld action models use robot dreams to make robot actions Weights & Biases

ToolsGoogle’s Gemini 3.6 Flash and 3.5 Flash-Lite Benchmark Scores Weights & Biases

ToolsTrack, guard, and remediate AI usage with W&B Weave and CrowdStrike Falcon AIDR Weights & Biases

ToolsGLM-5.2: The open coding model that put the critic back into RL Weights & Biases