The name is the button.

An agent writes the code now, and a human thumb hovers over Accept all a hundred times a day. The honest question of this decade is what, exactly, you just accepted. So I read the diff.

Eight years as a backend engineer in Stockholm, back in Tokyo since 2023, and I still ship something small most nights, usually badly. My one rule: the only real review of a model is the thing you built with it. That is why there is no leaderboard on this site.

Around a hundred and forty sources come through — the labs' own posts, the papers, the tools, the runtimes and languages nobody is watching yet, the chip under the demo, and the newsletters people actually forward. What is moving gets counted so the week reads at a glance, and every few days I explain one mechanism in plain words.

A story here is a headline, a short excerpt, one image and the link to whoever wrote it. We never reproduce the post; the images belong to their authors. A post written in Japanese appears in Japanese, exactly as it was published, and the link goes to the original.

— Yuki Halvorsen, Tokyo

← Accept All Archive

MIT Technology ReviewValley

When can we say AI made a scientific discovery?

September 28

This story originally appeared in The Algorithm, our weekly newsletter on AI. To get stories like this in your inbox first, sign up here .

Read at MIT Technology Review ↗

One letter a week, in your inbox.

Latest

When can we say AI made a scientific discovery?

More from MIT Technology Review on Accept All

ValleyThe Download: the Pentagon’s AI-powered lie detector and young organ limits MIT Technology Review

ValleyThe Pentagon wants $30 million to build an AI-powered lie detector MIT Technology Review

ValleyThe Download: a bid to scrap the virtual wall and AI hits Climate Week MIT Technology Review

ValleyAI is dominating the conversation at Climate Week MIT Technology Review