The name is the button.

An agent writes the code now, and a human thumb hovers over Accept all a hundred times a day. The honest question of this decade is what, exactly, you just accepted. So I read the diff.

Eight years as a backend engineer in Stockholm, back in Tokyo since 2023, and I still ship something small most nights, usually badly. My one rule: the only real review of a model is the thing you built with it. That is why there is no leaderboard on this site.

Around a hundred and forty sources come through — the labs' own posts, the papers, the tools, the runtimes and languages nobody is watching yet, the chip under the demo, and the newsletters people actually forward. What is moving gets counted so the week reads at a glance, and every few days I explain one mechanism in plain words.

A story here is a headline, a short excerpt, one image and the link to whoever wrote it. We never reproduce the post; the images belong to their authors. A post written in Japanese appears in Japanese, exactly as it was published, and the link goes to the original.

— Yuki Halvorsen, Tokyo

← Accept All Archive

Financial Times TechEurope

Why Big Tech wants more economists

October 2

Does AI research have a conflict of interest problem?

Read at Financial Times Tech ↗

One letter a week, in your inbox.

Latest

Why Big Tech wants more economists

More from Financial Times Tech on Accept All

EuropeIs circular financing in AI a problem? Financial Times Tech

EuropeIs AI supercharging science? Financial Times Tech

EuropeAn AI sovereign wealth fund isn’t progressive — it’s techno-imperialism Financial Times Tech

EuropeIt’s raining AI, and won’t stop! Financial Times Tech

EuropeJapan plans $140bn AI data centre push with Dell and Jera Financial Times Tech

EuropeWhy we can thumb our noses at AI Financial Times Tech