The name is the button.

An agent writes the code now, and a human thumb hovers over Accept all a hundred times a day. The honest question of this decade is what, exactly, you just accepted. So I read the diff.

Eight years as a backend engineer in Stockholm, back in Tokyo since 2023, and I still ship something small most nights, usually badly. My one rule: the only real review of a model is the thing you built with it. That is why there is no leaderboard on this site.

Around a hundred and forty sources come through — the labs' own posts, the papers, the tools, the runtimes and languages nobody is watching yet, the chip under the demo, and the newsletters people actually forward. What is moving gets counted so the week reads at a glance, and every few days I explain one mechanism in plain words.

A story here is a headline, a short excerpt, one image and the link to whoever wrote it. We never reproduce the post; the images belong to their authors. A post written in Japanese appears in Japanese, exactly as it was published, and the link goes to the original.

— Yuki Halvorsen, Tokyo

← Accept All Archive

Gary MarcusVoices

Will Generative AI do more harm than good?

10.24

In early March 2023, I had a debate with Keith Teare, hosted by the organization Open to Debate, on the question of whether ChatGPT would do more harm than good.

Read at Gary Marcus ↗

One letter a week, starting soon.

Latest

Will Generative AI do more harm than good?

More from Gary Marcus on Accept All

VoicesAll the king’s horses and all the king’s men haven’t been able to put CoreWeave back together again Gary Marcus

VoicesBreaking news: U.S. banks are taking hits from AI agents Gary Marcus

VoicesGenerative AI in disarray Gary Marcus

VoicesIt remains “very difficult [to find] actual, materially measurable financial impacts” from spending on AI, per new study Gary Marcus

VoicesCould this be the Frontier Labs’ WeWork moment? Gary Marcus

VoicesWe must recall open-ended AI agents with internet access from the market, now Gary Marcus