The name is the button.

An agent writes the code now, and a human thumb hovers over Accept all a hundred times a day. The honest question of this decade is what, exactly, you just accepted. So I read the diff.

Eight years as a backend engineer in Stockholm, back in Tokyo since 2023, and I still ship something small most nights, usually badly. My one rule: the only real review of a model is the thing you built with it. That is why there is no leaderboard on this site.

Around a hundred and forty sources come through — the labs' own posts, the papers, the tools, the runtimes and languages nobody is watching yet, the chip under the demo, and the newsletters people actually forward. What is moving gets counted so the week reads at a glance, and every few days I explain one mechanism in plain words.

A story here is a headline, a short excerpt, one image and the link to whoever wrote it. We never reproduce the post; the images belong to their authors. A post written in Japanese appears in Japanese, exactly as it was published, and the link goes to the original.

— Yuki Halvorsen, Tokyo

← Accept All Archive

IBM ResearchResearch

A theoretical separation between quantum computers & LLMs

09.15

Recent research further demonstrates the theoretical abilities of quantum computing

Chips & compute AI Computer Science Quantum Research

Read at IBM Research ↗

One letter a week, starting soon.

Latest

A theoretical separation between quantum computers & LLMs

Related

ResearchHow llm-d makes the most of the hardware you already have IBM Research

SiliconVera Rubin NVL72 Agentic Inference: 67x better Performance per Dollar SemiAnalysis

SiliconA Brain Too Big to Carry — On-Device vs Datacenter Inference SemiAnalysis

SiliconHow OpenAI Used Its Own LLMs to Design Its Jalapeño Chip IEEE Spectrum AI

SiliconLong Live the Short King: Why 4-hi HBM Wins SemiAnalysis

SiliconThe Air Computer The Chip Letter