The name is the button.

An agent writes the code now, and a human thumb hovers over Accept all a hundred times a day. The honest question of this decade is what, exactly, you just accepted. So I read the diff.

Eight years as a backend engineer in Stockholm, back in Tokyo since 2023, and I still ship something small most nights, usually badly. My one rule: the only real review of a model is the thing you built with it. That is why there is no leaderboard on this site.

Around a hundred and forty sources come through — the labs' own posts, the papers, the tools, the runtimes and languages nobody is watching yet, the chip under the demo, and the newsletters people actually forward. What is moving gets counted so the week reads at a glance, and every few days I explain one mechanism in plain words.

A story here is a headline, a short excerpt, one image and the link to whoever wrote it. We never reproduce the post; the images belong to their authors. A post written in Japanese appears in Japanese, exactly as it was published, and the link goes to the original.

— Yuki Halvorsen, Tokyo

← Accept All Archive

EE TimesSilicon

Arm Comments on Jury Decision in Qualcomm Trial

10.24

Following our initial coverage of the Delaware federal jury verdict in the Qualcomm and Arm dispute, Arm contacted EE Times to clarify the IP vendor’s position.

Read at EE Times ↗

One letter a week, starting soon.

Latest

Arm Comments on Jury Decision in Qualcomm Trial

More from EE Times on Accept All

SiliconTwo Dollars and a Test Suite EE Times

SiliconFrom Cloud AI to Edge AI: How BIWIN Enables the Next Generation of Storage and Memory Solutions EE Times

SiliconDeepx Building Open Software Ecosystem to Scale Physical AI Beyond the Data Center EE Times

SiliconEverspin Expands MRAM Push into AI Servers, Data Centers, Satellite Systems EE Times

SiliconIndia’s OSAT Buildout Puts Semiconductor Testing in Focus EE Times

SiliconWhy Chip Design AI Benchmarks Must Go Beyond Functional Correctness EE Times