The name is the button.

An agent writes the code now, and a human thumb hovers over Accept all a hundred times a day. The honest question of this decade is what, exactly, you just accepted. So I read the diff.

Eight years as a backend engineer in Stockholm, back in Tokyo since 2023, and I still ship something small most nights, usually badly. My one rule: the only real review of a model is the thing you built with it. That is why there is no leaderboard on this site.

Around a hundred and forty sources come through — the labs' own posts, the papers, the tools, the runtimes and languages nobody is watching yet, the chip under the demo, and the newsletters people actually forward. What is moving gets counted so the week reads at a glance, and every few days I explain one mechanism in plain words.

A story here is a headline, a short excerpt, one image and the link to whoever wrote it. We never reproduce the post; the images belong to their authors. A post written in Japanese appears in Japanese, exactly as it was published, and the link goes to the original.

— Yuki Halvorsen, Tokyo

← Accept All Archive

Ars Technica AIValley

Google's early attempt to pay websites for AI answers is struggling

September 30

Google's shift to AI-powered search has upended the way the world's largest search engine generates web traffic, rankling large and small publishers alike.

Read at Ars Technica AI ↗

One letter a week, in your inbox.

Latest

Google's early attempt to pay websites for AI answers is struggling

More from Ars Technica AI on Accept All

ValleyGoogle figures out how to watermark AI-designed proteins Ars Technica AI

ValleyOpenAI delays IPO over AI safety concerns Ars Technica AI

ValleyProtests against OpenAI get increasingly creative Ars Technica AI

ValleyAMD acquires World Labs AI startup, upping the ante against Nvidia Ars Technica AI

ValleyHere's what actually happened in OpenAI's Australian gov't server hack Ars Technica AI

ValleyOpenAI says planned GPT-6.1 is too insecure to release Ars Technica AI