The name is the button.

An agent writes the code now, and a human thumb hovers over Accept all a hundred times a day. The honest question of this decade is what, exactly, you just accepted. So I read the diff.

Eight years as a backend engineer in Stockholm, back in Tokyo since 2023, and I still ship something small most nights, usually badly. My one rule: the only real review of a model is the thing you built with it. That is why there is no leaderboard on this site.

Around two hundred sources come through — the labs' own posts, the papers, the tools, the runtimes and languages nobody is watching yet, the chip under the demo, and the newsletters people actually forward. What is moving gets counted so the week reads at a glance, and every few days I explain one mechanism in plain words.

A story here is a headline, a short excerpt, one image and the link to whoever wrote it. We never reproduce the post; the images belong to their authors. A post written in Japanese appears in Japanese, exactly as it was published, and the link goes to the original.

— Yuki Halvorsen, Tokyo

← Accept All Archive

METRResearch

Our approach to working with AI companies

10.14

This blog post explains how we approach working with AI companies on projects that the public might rely on to understand risks.

Read at METR ↗

One letter a week, starting soon.

Latest

Our approach to working with AI companies

More from METR on Accept All

ResearchHow an assessor could investigate control and monitoring of internal AI agents METR

ResearchA proposal for better informing the public about loss-of-control risks from frontier AI development METR

ResearchHow an assessor could investigate alignment of unreleased AI models METR

ResearchHow an assessor could investigate evidence of acceleration from the automation of AI R&D METR

ResearchAI systems could cover up misbehavior METR

ResearchImplementing and Evaluating a Basic Per-Action Monitor for Safer Evals METR